The literature on urban planning and spatial planning increasingly emphasizes the need for a more thorough analysis of the impact of pandemics on urban spatial policymaking. This article identifies critical proposals for change regarding urban spatial policies that emerged after the COVID-19 pandemi...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/bbabba660c7b48d7a660931fa5302614 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | The literature on urban planning and spatial planning
increasingly emphasizes the need for a more thorough
analysis of the impact of pandemics on urban spatial
policymaking. This article identifies critical proposals
for change regarding urban spatial policies that emerged
after the COVID-19 pandemic and relates these to literature
on spatial planning. The focus was on two issues
directly relevant to this topic: urban spatial planning and
environmental protection. The use of the analytical-comparative
method, preceded by a literature review, allowed
a preliminary characterization of the selected works. The
following research questions were posed: 1) What critical
spatial planning topics have been addressed in discussion
of the pandemic? and 2) Have publications on both the
pandemic and urban planning made a vital contribution
to the broader discussion on institutional aspects
of urban planning? An important conclusion is that the
COVID-19 pandemic has revealed the consequences of
ignoring theoretical findings in public policymaking,
which can lead to social and environmental inequalities
on a global scale, and differences in pandemic restrictions
across political and social systems. |
|---|